<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quick Guide to Writing about Plus Fashion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fatchic.net/2008/05/12/a-quick-guide-to-writing-about-plus-fashion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fatchic.net/2008/05/12/a-quick-guide-to-writing-about-plus-fashion/</link>
	<description>Plus size clothing finds for fabulous women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://fatchic.net/2008/05/12/a-quick-guide-to-writing-about-plus-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-13759</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatchic.dianarajchel.com/?p=1239#comment-13759</guid>
		<description>I like the point about different body shapes.  It makes such a huge difference in what someone can wear and seems to get looked over even in the regular-size marketplace.  Haute couture is aimed at women with very boyish figures (ew) and you really have to go down-market to find clothes aimed at hourglassy women -- to say nothing of the frustration that must be having a pear shape.  

Maybe the focus shouldn&#039;t be so much top-down (from the celebs/personalities) but bottom-up (local designers driving trends up to MadAve).  It would take more work of course, but isn&#039;t being a trend-setter always more satisfying?  Yes, it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the point about different body shapes.  It makes such a huge difference in what someone can wear and seems to get looked over even in the regular-size marketplace.  Haute couture is aimed at women with very boyish figures (ew) and you really have to go down-market to find clothes aimed at hourglassy women &#8212; to say nothing of the frustration that must be having a pear shape.  </p>
<p>Maybe the focus shouldn&#8217;t be so much top-down (from the celebs/personalities) but bottom-up (local designers driving trends up to MadAve).  It would take more work of course, but isn&#8217;t being a trend-setter always more satisfying?  Yes, it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://fatchic.net/2008/05/12/a-quick-guide-to-writing-about-plus-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-13757</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatchic.dianarajchel.com/?p=1239#comment-13757</guid>
		<description>While I agree personally that plus size doesn&#039;t start at 16 (or even 18 - I worked with a size 16 a few years back and she couldn&#039;t find clothes to fit her in regular or plus size stores). I normally go by 14 because the stores I worked in started at that range. I have also gone by 10 because the &quot;fashion industry&quot; works from the standard that it is plus but I refuse to go to their 8 which is just ridiculous. 

As for America I think plus size people like to claim her because she doesn&#039;t necessarily fit the Hollywood mode especially when she made Real Women Have Curves (she&#039;s lost a lot of weight since then). 

I also read the post on Kim Kardashian as a “plus role model&quot; and thought &quot;not&quot;. That&#039;s really stretching. 

I &quot;dugg&quot; your story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree personally that plus size doesn&#8217;t start at 16 (or even 18 &#8211; I worked with a size 16 a few years back and she couldn&#8217;t find clothes to fit her in regular or plus size stores). I normally go by 14 because the stores I worked in started at that range. I have also gone by 10 because the &#8220;fashion industry&#8221; works from the standard that it is plus but I refuse to go to their 8 which is just ridiculous. </p>
<p>As for America I think plus size people like to claim her because she doesn&#8217;t necessarily fit the Hollywood mode especially when she made Real Women Have Curves (she&#8217;s lost a lot of weight since then). </p>
<p>I also read the post on Kim Kardashian as a “plus role model&#8221; and thought &#8220;not&#8221;. That&#8217;s really stretching. </p>
<p>I &#8220;dugg&#8221; your story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.213 seconds -->
