<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The belted top layer for plus size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fatchic.net/2009/10/20/the-belted-top-layer-for-plus-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fatchic.net/2009/10/20/the-belted-top-layer-for-plus-size/</link>
	<description>Plus size clothing finds for fabulous women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://fatchic.net/2009/10/20/the-belted-top-layer-for-plus-size/comment-page-1/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatchic.net/?p=2648#comment-14519</guid>
		<description>I agree on the hourglass type. Also not everyone can pull off the same thickness. Some people look good in a thin belt while others suit a wide belt. Personally, I love the wide belt. The thin belt tends to disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the hourglass type. Also not everyone can pull off the same thickness. Some people look good in a thin belt while others suit a wide belt. Personally, I love the wide belt. The thin belt tends to disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.274 seconds -->
